For point #1 below, I have dug around a bit more and the code is relatively
easy to understand (CachedXpathApi). I can basically mimic the behaviour of
the CachedXpathApi myself and this allows me to precompile my Xpath and also I
can just create XpathContext(false) and call reset() on it, just like the code
does. This will work around my problem for #1.
CachedXpathApi()
{
xpathSupport = new CachedXpathApi(false);
}
public XObject eval(Node contextNode, String str, Node namespaceNode)
throws TransformerException
{
PrefixResolverDefault prefixResolver = new
PrefixResolverDefault(((Node) (namespaceNode.getNodeType() != 9 ? namespaceNode
: ((Node) (((Document)namespaceNode).getDocumentElement())))));
XPath xpath = new XPath(str, null, prefixResolver, 0, null);
int ctxtNode = xpathSupport.getDTMHandleFromNode(contextNode);
return xpath.execute(xpathSupport, ctxtNode, prefixResolver);
}
--- On Wed, 9/30/09, Sandeep Takhar <sandeep_tak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Sandeep Takhar <sandeep_tak...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Getting optimal performance for CachedXpathApi searches and DOM
> parsing
> To: xalan-j-users@xml.apache.org
> Received: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 9:24 PM
> Hi.
>
> I am new to the list and sorry if I get something
> wrong. I searched the existing archives, but could not
> find the answer I am looking for. Thanks for any help
> you have.
>
> We are seeing some small performance issues in our
> production environment. I am busy seeing if I can
> reproduce them. My questions are regarding these
> issues and possibly working around them.
>
> 1. CachedXpathApi is working well for us. I do see that the
> constructor is expensive. I read on some IBM
> documentation that if you don't reuse parsers..the
> constructor is expensive because it tries to find a factory
> via jar file location (looping through the classpath).
> In fact I see this happening when I look at the thread
> dump. I see all the documentation and comments that
> indicate if you change a source document, then you need a
> new CachedXpathApi. I see two things that I am not
> sure may work.
>
> a) cachedXpathApi.getXpathContext().reset(). Can I
> call this instead of creating a new CachedXpathApi and then
> using the cachedXpathApi object to search new
> document? I will still make the cachedXpathApi only
> execute in a single thread, but I don't want to call the
> constructor.
> b)There is also a constructor which takes another
> CachedXpathApi(CachedXPathApi cachedXpathApi). Is this
> of some use?
> c) Can I use compiled xpath expressions and achieve a
> similar effect as the CachedXpathApi somehow...where I don't
> have to construct the CachedXpathApi()? Does someone
> have a quick sample?
>
> 2. We are using the apache DOM parser. Basically the
> DOMParser is the default apache one (version 2.7.0).
> Currently we create the Builder from the factory and then
> call parse.
> DocumentBuilderFactory.newDocumentBuilder()....I cannot
> remember exactly the syntax. We can certainly not have
> to create the DocumentBuilder each time and I am suggesting
> this as a fix. What I see happen is that there is some
> minor performance issues that happen in production in the
> parse method. I don't have the execution thread handy,
> but it is always spending time on
> DocumentScanner$DTDDispatcher.dispatch method (may not be
> exact syntax) Looks like all methods for the
> declaration handler. I have to double check that, but
> the methods are named like the sax declaration handler...but
> we are not using SAX. We have an entityId as the
> second line in the xml file that points to a DTD that only
> has a single line in the DTD file. I've tried to
> understand the code, but haven't
> been able to figure it out
>
> a) Will I stop seeing DTDDispatcher time taken in the
> threads if I remove the entity line in the source xml (no
> reference to a DTD)?
> b) Is what I'm seeing completely normal?
> c) can I set a property that will turn off the
> DTDDispatcher.dispatch method from being called?
>
>
>
> Here are the methods I see that are spending time and
> things like string.intern(). Maybe it is completely
> normal, but it doesn't explain why it is slower in
> production...except that production load may be causing
> it...and that would be fine.
>
> public void elementDecl(String name, String model)
> throws SAXException;
> public void attributeDecl(String elementName,
> String attributeName, String type, String
> mode,
> String defaultValue) throws
> SAXException;
> public void internalEntityDecl(String name, String
> value)
> throws SAXException;
> public void externalEntityDecl(String name, String
> publicID,
> String systemID) throws SAXException;
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and
> bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now
> http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
>
__________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your
favourite sites. Download it now
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
