Hmmm... Then having
<xsl:variable name="sections">
<xsl:for-each select="descendant::section">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@* />
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:variable>
$node-set := xalan:nodeset($sections)/section
for each node in $node-set do
apply the filter [utils:dummy(true())][1] to the node in the node-set
done
Should behave the same. But it does not.
???
Regards,
Adrian.
On 22/06/2010 15:10, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Adrian Herscu<adrian.her...@gmail.com> wrote:
1. xsl variables:
<xsl:variable name="sections" select="descendant::section" />
and then use this XPath expression instead
xalan:nodeset($sections)[utils:dummy(true())][1]
then the dummy() function will be called 4 times (while the output xml will
remain the same) !
I'm tempted to imagine, that Xalan might be trying to do as following
(written as pseudo-code), for the above case:
$node-set := xalan:nodeset($sections)
for each node in $node-set do
apply the filter [utils:dummy(true())][1] to the node in the node-set
done
Which I think will likely cause the expression, utils:dummy(true()) to
be evaluated as many times as the number of nodes in the node-set.
I think, to be able to evaluate utils:dummy(true()) only once, the
processor needs to do some hard static analysis of the expression,
which could an implementation constraint.