Hi Julian, On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de> wrote: > <xsl:variable name="t"> > <root> > <x>1</x> > <x>2</x> > <x>3</x> > </root> > </xsl:variable> > > <xsl:variable name="tns" select="exslt:node-set($t)/root/x"/> [1]
> <xsl:call-template name="foo"> > <xsl:with-param name="t" select="$tns"/> > <xsl:with-param name="i" select="'1'"/> > </xsl:call-template> > <xsl:template name="foo"> > <xsl:param name="t"/> > <xsl:param name="i"/> > <xsl:variable name="tns" select="exslt:node-set($t)"/> [2] Since at line [1], you've already constructed a node-set then what's the need of doing again node-set($t) at [2] ? At line [2] I believe, $t is already a node-set and must be accessed simply like $t and not node-set($t). Thought I haven't cross checked what's Xalan's behavior when we do for example: xx:node-set(xx:node-set($rtf)) which is what I understand you've intended to mean with your syntax. And this logically looks wrong to me. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
