I want to come up with a standard helper type of class format, where a
helper is defined as a class that adds additional functionality to an
existing javascript class.

I don't think we want to modify object definitions directly, that could
have some problems when people start mixing in conflicting toolkits.

If you look at xap.util.ArrayHelper, it always takes an array as the
first argument. I would like to remove the "Helper" part and just have
the formula where

"xap.util.XXXX" is a helper class if XXXX is a standard JS class. Maybe
instead of xap.util this should be under xap.lang or xap.js or something
like that?

Thoughts?

James Margaris

Reply via email to