On 12/4/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/29/06, Scott Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose adding the following to the JIRA xap-developers > group. They have been filing and/or fixing a lot of defects recently > and it would good to have them updating the status. > > trevdak - Trevor Oldak > mattcarbone - Matt Carbone > rgagne - Rob Gagne This seems reasonable to me. I've seen several +1s; does anyone out there have any concerns? Martin had a question that appears to have been answered (Martin, correct me if I'm wrong.).
You are correct. I had searched the archives, but it appears that some of the relevant contributions (e.g. those listed by Scott) were committed without attribution - something I might suggest being more vigilant about in the future. But as I said, I don't have an issue with granting these folks xap-developers karma in JIRA. -- Martin Cooper I'd require a higher standard for committership (along the lines of
what Martin was pointing out), but, personally, I think a project should be able to come up with any standard they like for Jira access, as long as that standard is applied consistently/non-discriminatingly. As a project mentor with Jira admin access, I'll add these three folks in a couple days if there appears to still be consensus to do so. Cliff
