Thanks - I see your changes. How do we want to handle such reports in the future? What could/should be included? And who can/should submit them? I am happy to take it on (I am a user). I jumped in here because I knew it was due.
Looking at other reports, I think including development (status and plans) community (including statistics, new committers, conferences, public mentions, project outreach, etc.), documentation and infrastructure issues (site, etc) as well as updates on key project criteria make sense. Ben Bloch -----Original Message----- From: James Margaris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 6:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: XAP report draft I filled in the XAP entry on the Feb report Wiki, I took a couple of things from here like the Wiki progress but most of it I left off... Some of these things are new to me which is weird given that it is supposed to be a summary of progress made and discussions had. James Margaris -----Original Message----- From: Ben Bloch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: XAP report draft [clip]
