Sure, I'll see what I can do. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Worth adding to website [WAS Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release]
In the incubator-general VOTE thread for the XAP 0.5.0 release, Sebb brought up 2 good points. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200803.mbox/b rowser March 13, 2008 and March 14th 2008. > Is there a RAT report? We should incorporate RAT into the build script so a RAT report is always available to XAP developers. > Normally there are separate source and binary archives In addition to Robert's suggestion of documenting better what is contained in our distribution and why, I think we should incorporate Sebb's suggestions and make 2 distributions. One for XAP users, and one for XAP developers. The XAP developers distribution should contain: /unittests JSDoc RAT It should also clean up redundancies noted: dojo.js.uncompressed.js custom_rhino.jar flash6_gateway.fla There may be other things we can do as well to improve our build and distribution of XAP. Does anyone want to tackle this? -Scott B On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release > > > > <snip> > > > > > >Normally there are separate source and binary archives. > > > > > > > Being that this is an Ajax toolkit, we have included all the source > > files in the distribution to allow people to be able to customize the > > application loading profile of their application. Users can either load > > one large file upfront and make zero JavaScript requests later, or a > > smaller upfront file and more JavaScript requests later. > > > > IMHO this is probably worth adding to the download page on the website > > BTW the website's look is great > > - robert >
