On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jason KG4WSV wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Gerry Creager<[email protected]> wrote:
Think of implementing positions and objects in a PostGIS or similar
geospatial(-aware) database...
I thought about that, but my concern is that requiring an extended RDB
as part of an xastir install seems a bit heavy for a typical user.
I'm basing this concern on a typical MySQL installation. Am I off
base?
PostGIS/Postgres is the direction I've been leaning in for several
years too. We use Postgres at work, having switched from Sybase,
and are quite happy with it. MySQL has made big strides over the
last few years but Postgres is darned-near bulletproof. Like
Sybase.
I'd really like to see generic SQL used so that the back-end could
be abstracted. Then we could use SQLite/Berkeley DB (yuk!) or even
flat files on extremely low-end equipment, MySQL or Postgres on real
hardware like laptops on up.
--
Curt, WE7U. <http://www.eskimo.com/~archer>
APRS: Where it's at! <http://www.xastir.org>
Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown
Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U.
The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
_______________________________________________
Xastir-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev
