On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote: > makes it harder to upgrade later,
upgrade what? I'm quite familiar with the reasoning behind shared libraries, but for a user building a library for a single purpose (e.g. to support a single app like xastir), there is zero benefit to a dynamically linked library, and many drawbacks, like the added complexity of building a shared library, especially in a cross platform situation (e.g. mac os x frequently gets left out). IMO we'd be better off without most shared libraries. -- -Jason kg4wsv _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
