Thomas Sprinzing wrote:
On 5-Jun-09, at 12:06 PM, Kurt A. Freiberger wrote:
$GPRMC,,V,,,,,,,,,,N*53
$GPGGA,235945.0,5717.746771,N,05717.746771,E,0,32,99.9,1.0,M,,,,*3B

b) why is the GPRMC broken, while GPGGA looks fine? The card has got a fix, does it?

The 6th field of the $GPGGA sentence is 0, which means there is no fix, i.e. the reported lat/lon can be anything. That's the same as $GPRMC sentence's 'V' in the second field.

  Tapio
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir

Reply via email to