On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Bill Vodall <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>. Is it really true that we're still using CVS? Not >>> >>> > Yes. There has been no compelling reason to switch to SVN. If it ain't >>> > broke... >>> >>> You meant switching to git, right?-) >> >> Yech. > > Git is the future... At least that's what most postings I'm seeing > say. As Tom says, change only when there's a real need - and then > reluctantly. I just wasn't sure if I missed something and the CVS I > was pulling was out of date. > > 73 > Bill
Git is a great piece of software. I use it daily for work and personal projects. But I've found that Mercurial with the Queues extension does a much smoother job handling the standard open source workflow of create code, generate patch, email patch, edit code, update patch, email patch again. The problem is that git commits are immutable, so you can't easily edit a patch. Mercurial's Mq extension solves this by providing a mechanism for removing and editing commits. http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension/ Tom KD7LXL _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
