On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Tom Russo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:38:24PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron > collision of the <[email protected]> flavor, containing: > > > > Hello Tom, > > > > I'm working on updating my Xastir documentation for Centos here to now > > use Github/Git vs. sf.net/CVS: > > > > > http://www.trinityos.com/HAM/CentosDigitalModes/hampacketizing-centos.html#19b.xastir > > > > In doing that update, I noticed the current xastir.spec file which is > > seemingly 13 years old (see change log at the end of the file) shows: > > > > %configure --without-graphicsmagick --with-rtree > > > > That seems BAD since we know that GraphicsMagick support is > > probably more reliable than say ImageMagick today. > > Yep. > > Here's the thing. Folks come and go on this project, contributing little > things for their favorite operating system, scripts that have made their > own lives easier, etc. And they got committed into CVS, even though the > developers themselves don't use them. > Wouldn't a developer still have to commit stuff like that into CVS?
I've written Xastir related scripts before, but I've never tried to get them into the repository. I did show Curt a revised version of the ads-b script a while back, but that was an attempt to get him to incorporate some or all of my changes into his - not to add a separate script to the repo. Did some non-Developers have the rights to commit changes into CVS? ----- < snip> ---- Lee - K5DAT _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir
