Xastir's documentation is a bit, um, fragmented? We have READMEs of various vintages, we've got a wiki that is sometimes (but not often) kept up-to-date.
I am starting to look into revamping more of our documentation, starting with README.MAPS (which is very, very outdated and not at all a good resource for first time users). I have to decide whether to rewrite the whole file or pitch it and just do the documentation on the wiki. We already have a "HowTo:MAPS" wiki page which is a subset of README.MAPS and almost as out of date. I don't want to have to maintain TWO documentation sets, as keeping them synced is a maintenance headache. So, of you remaining Xastir users, what would you prefer to look at: README files or a wiki, or something else? And if you can imagine yourself being a first-time Xastir user, what would you prefer to be told to do when you have to learn how to do something for the first time: "go look at our wiki on page xxxxx" or "go read the file README.XXX" or something else? And while I'm at it: "do you actually use Xastir anymore?" -- Tom Russo KM5VY Tijeras, NM echo "prpv_a'rfg_cnf_har_cvcr" | sed -e 's/_/ /g' | tr [a-m][n-z] [n-z][a-m] _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://xastir.org/mailman/listinfo/xastir
