This makes sense to me. Should we have thin, deprecated, proxies in the old package or is that over the top?
Regards, Alan Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:13:01 To:[email protected] Subject: Re: Classloading branch Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named org.apache.xbean.classloaders instead of keeping the old one org.apache.xbean.server.classloader It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ... On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a > > separate module. Should be simple enough. > > > > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote > > afterwards, if all goes well. > > > Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone? > > > Regards, > Alan > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
