Any strong opinions in favor? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Ray Denenberg" <[email protected]> Date: Apr 4, 2011 11:23 AM Subject: internal uncertain/approximate LAST CALL To: <[email protected]>
There was no response addressing the concern I raised in the message below, which I take to mean that nobody cares if we drop internal uncertain/approximate. If you care about it, please speak up. --Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of the Developing Date/Time Standards > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Denenberg, Ray > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [DATETIME] BNF complexities > > BNF for the dateTime spec is reasonably straightforward, except for > representing INTERNAL uncertain/approximate. > > Thus it is easy to incorporate > 2004-06? > 2004-06-11? > 2004-06~ > 2004-06-11~ > etc. > > But more complex to support things like > 2004-(06)? > (2004)?06-11 > > or even: > (1985-12~)? > > Not impossible but it will make the overall BNF less readable. > > I'd like opinions on whether we really need these, or can they be > dropped. > > --Ray
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
