On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote: > So EDTF is starting to get much more concrete. Would be nice if we > could switch to this, or a subset of it, as primary CSL input date > format soon.
I think the parser embedded in citeproc-js can already parse this syntax, for ordinary dates, date intervals, and dates BCE. It would be good to have some sample dates data to work with, and test fixtures based on it. The test data and fixture that I used to build the citeproc-js parser are in the source archive, if anyone wants to work on this. Frank > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Denenberg, Ray <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:33 AM > Subject: Draft BNF available > To: [email protected] > > > A preliminary draft BNF is at: > http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/bnf.html > > --Ray > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Xperia(TM) PLAY > It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming > smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. > And it wants your games. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
