On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Whether this can be introduced in 1.0.1 depends on how the ordinals are
> > defined. Currently, the ordinal index is included in the element name
> (e.g.
> > "13" in <term name="ordinal-13"/>). This is somewhat limiting for
> > validation, as, as far as I know, you'd have explicitly define each
> ordinal
> > in the schema (and I guess we don't know the index range that will be
> > needed, although we could just pick a high number). A more flexible
> approach
> > would be <term name="ordinal" index="13"/>, but this obviously breaks
> with
> > the convention in CSL 1.0.
>
> >From a technical perspective, it's easy enough to redfine the pattern
> as a regular expression. Given that we currently don't provide any
> dedicated documentation for each of those values, there's reasonable
> basis for making the change.
>
Ah, right. I was overlooking that "ordinal-13" is just an attribute-value,
so regular expressions should work. So I guess we can keep the existing
scheme.
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
