On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Dan Stillman <[email protected]> wrote:
> We don't use the updated value—just the system timestamp when the script > is run. OIC. Isn't that potentially dangerous (if we assume it likely that sources for styles will proliferate, and that a given style may be available from more than one source)? Or to put it more directly, why not use the git value? > (But if the script was run from a post-commit hook then our timestamp would be basically the same as the commit time.) Isn't the question of how the script is run (outboard vs. post-commit, etc.) really orthogonal to the timestamp issue? E.g. you can get the git commit timestamp from a simple shell script. Bruce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
