On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Reviewing the EDTF draft, I just noticed the distinction between > uncertain > > and approximate dates. Unfortunately, this got mixed up a bit in CSL 1.0 > (we > > have an is-uncertain-date conditional, but the spec gives an example of > its > > use for an approximate date). We could introduce an additional > > is-approximate-date conditional, if desired. > > To be honest, I don't really understand the practical difference > between the two, or how we would represent them, beyond "c.2000". > http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/spec.html includes definitions of the two. Anyway, it's not a big problem, but ideally we should have used is-approximate-date instead of is-uncertain-date. Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
