On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Frank Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Frank Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's great to see work on style-level testing. It might be interesting >>> to have a core suite of test templates in the standard test format. >>> People with an interest in support for particular styles could then >>> provide result strings, so that the style could be brought under the >>> test framework. >>> >>> Any possibility that the Pandoc test suite might be migrated to the >>> shared test framework? >> >> What would you need? The raw markdown template doc, and the test data? > > I'm tied down with work on legal support, but if someone were to work > on this, they would probably find a set of standard tests most useful.
I don't know what that means, though. That this markdown + data gets converted into the JSON test format you developed? One issue is that CSL proper is silent on some details of citations (like citation prefixes). Bruce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
