> This raises a point about our way of handling releases though. If we could
> be confident that CSL processors wouldn't break by new elements and/or
> attributes, we could move to a more fluid release schedule where features
> can be added to styles in the repo once consensus has been reached to
> include those features into the next CSL release.
that would be very useful - the status quo is a little unsatisfactory,
because we also don't have a good way of tracking styles where
features (I'm mainly thinking of delimiter-precedes-et-al right now)
need to be added in the future - I know there are a bunch of styles
with that requirement but I wouldn't know how to track them down
easily right now - much easier if it could have been just
implemented...


-- 
------
Sebastian Karcher
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Political Science
Northwestern University

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to