On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Charles Parnot
<[email protected]>wrote:
> So if other implementations are fine too, then we could maybe switch to
> 1.0.1 for validation.
>
My main reservation is that I pushed for some new features for CSL 1.0.1
that are in the trunk schema and spec (and in most cases supported by
citeproc-js), but which haven't received a lot of review from the other CSL
developers/implementors, so CSL 1.0.1 final might look a bit different. So
until we release CSL 1.0.1 I'd like to hold off on adding styles to the
repo with 1.0.1 features.
We could move to a more agile development track, where we green light and
implement features on a case-per-case basis, but that's another discussion.
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
