On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Karcher <
[email protected]> wrote:
> As for testing for item types - I'm not willing to go without. I think
> there are many cases where it's somewhere between hard to impossible
> to do that (e.g. dealing with volume #s or page labels), especially if
> we want to deal correctly with incomplete date (think e.g. a chapter
> that doesn't have a publisher). But there's a difference between using
> some type-based testing and _only_ using type-based testing. I took
> Bruce to object to the latter and I completely agree with that.
>
> That said, we should standardize variables for item types, but that's
> a topic for a different thread.
>
That's exactly how I feel about things as well.
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
