On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Ian Mulvany <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bruce, why would you specify the prefix, rather than just denoting > that the node is a link and then leaving it up to the input > to provide the full URI? > > Would one want to be able to have an implementation that could auto > render the core identifiers: PMID, ARXIV, ISSN, DOI, in which case > where would the sanitisation of the input be left to the implementations?
In the example I posted, which is NOT very well thought out, I was assuming the full URI would be constructed in the "doi-uri" macro. So in this example you'd have "doi:" that is plain text, and the content that follows would a link. The problem I didn't think through is how to distinguish rendered content from link. Bruce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
