ccing list ... On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Steve Ridout <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 May 2012 00:57, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So WRT to Rintze's point on visualization, random thoughts: >> >> 1) do we need the explicit "layout" nodes? I imagine you do this to >> include the attributes, or not, but am wondering if it's possible to achieve >> the same thing otherwise; maybe by having select lists that are blank by >> default? > > > We'll have a think about this. Is there a good reason why the layout node > can't be a group node? They seem very similar in functionality, and it would > be one less thing for a user to understand.
Perhaps, though they do differ a bit functionally. >> 2) I do get tripped up by the nested groups, and trying to understand what >> they mean. Perhaps this is the primary issue? > > This is fundamental to the design of CSL. I'd love to figure out a simpler > way to display this but haven't yet managed to think of one. Perhaps one observation is just to say different node types have different functions, so perhaps if there were a way to more clearly distinguish groups from other (and in particular rendering) nodes? Bruce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
