On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This gets to something I earlier mentioned: that we might want to
>> >> include something about conformance and foreign attributes in the
>> >> spec. As a possible model (I don't have time to look around for
>> >> others), here's one:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#extension-attributes
>> >
>> >
>> > Would it be enough to note that any attributes, or any elements
>> > (together
>> > will all their attributes and child elements) not covered by the CSL
>> > schema
>> > should be ignored?
>>
>> I don't know. Elements get complicated. I'll poke around for other
>> models (maybe RSS or Atom?) when I have time, and we can compare.
>
>
> RSS: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html#extendingRss
> Atom: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287#section-6
Will take a look (as should others); thanks.
>> But t
>
>
> Yes, but w! (did you mean to write something here?)
Yes, new keyboard.
Was just saying the main point is if we do this it makes the earlier
discussion about style branching easier.
On elements, my concern is stuff like:
<foo:mynewthing>
<cs:name>
<foo:bar/>
</cs:name>
</foo:mynewthing>
Bruce
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
