On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote:
... > The rationale is explained here: > http://citationstyles.org/2010/05/30/csl-1-0-specification-update-2010-05-30/ > There are also a couple of xbiblio forum threads about it. Calling this > release 1.1 would be inconvenient because we want to keep the value on the > "version" attribute on the cs:style and cs:locale root elements as "1.0". I think this is among the reasons why we need some language on conformance: we're having to come up with complicated solutions to work around aligning different versioning priorities. Ideally, we can redefine what "backward compatible" means so that this becomes easier to manage going forward for everyone. Bruce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
