On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Charles Parnot <[email protected]> wrote: > Discussing the "algorithms" to get to the actual results is not as useful > IMO. Or at least if should not come first, and only be formalized when enough > examples of the issue at hand have been produced. The disambiguation process > is another one of the hair-rising issue.
Same goes for parsing of raw dates or unstructured names. These kinds of things mostly evolve based on user feedback, so I agree with Charles that test fixtures should play an important role here. Based on those, we indeed might be able to extract some standardized rules. Rintze ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
