The use case is indirect citation. I cite Doe, who is citing (or more
commonly quoting) Smith.
So either we cover this:
1) now, using a free text prefix
2) we add a new feature to processors to support this
Bruce
On Nov 30, 2012 7:57 AM, "Carles Pina" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know the final use case, but one of our users would like to
> use "in" instead of "and" in some inline citations. Like "(Smith and
> Murphy)" would be "(Smith in Murphy)".
>
> I read:
> http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification.html#name
> ----
> and
> Specifies the delimiter between the second to last and last name
> of the names in a name variable. Allowed values are "text" (selects
> the "and" term, e.g. "Doe, Johnson and Smith") and "symbol" (selects
> the ampersand, e.g. "Doe, Johnson & Smith").
> ----
>
> I'll get more information about the use case. I wonder if some of you
> have thought about it.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Carles Pina | Software Engineer
> http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/Carles-Pina/
>
> Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com
> Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
> TUNE You got it built. Now make it sing. Tune shows you how.
> http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> xbiblio-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
TUNE You got it built. Now make it sing. Tune shows you how.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
