It looks to me like the example needs to be amended.

Frank

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:43 PM, andrea rossato <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm implementing the subsequent-author-substitute-rule and I'm having
> problems in understanding the specification examples for "partial-first"
> and "partial-each".[1]
>
> This is the description of "partial-each" substitution:
>
>     when one or more rendered names in the name variable match those in
>     the preceding bibliographic entry, the value of
>     subsequent-author-substitute substitutes for each matching name.
>     Matching starts with the first name, and continues up to the first
>     mismatch.
>
> Why, in the example, the name "Doe" is not substituted in the third,
> fifth and seventh references? Doesn't it fit into the definition?
>
> The same for "partial-first": it seems to me that "Doe" should always be
> substituted.
>
> Can someone please explain to me the rules applied in the examples?
>
> Best,
> Andrea
>
>
> [1] http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification.html#reference-grouping
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> xbiblio-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to