On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Aurimas Vinckevicius <[email protected]> wrote: > I would highly support that decision (to move to a different ML). One reason > being that I could not for the life of me find a way to reply to a thread > without having one of the emails from that thread (which I had deleted). > Perhaps there's a way though...
The current xbiblio mailing list is mirrored at http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/, which allows you to reply to existing messages. > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote: >> While we're on it, any interest in moving to another ML option; like >> Google Groups? Renaming the SourceForge project will be less work than moving to another mailing list provider (somebody described the move from SourceForge to Google Groups at https://github.com/wojdyr/fityk/wiki/MigrationToGoogleGroups ). Are there any mailing list providers we should look at other than Google Groups? My main worry is be that Google might shuts down Google Groups at some point. SourceForge might have a clunky interface (and include ad links in the messages), but it has been reliable for CSL for close to a decade now. Rintze ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
