I will only say that I worry that this is a longer list than I'd like, and
that it may result in a fair bit of complaining from users, who get
unexpected results.
Am not sure I'm right, and I don't feel really strong about this; just
sayin'.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sebastian Karcher <
[email protected]> wrote:
> resending without all the thread at the bottom - sourceforge is complaining
> this is the list from Wikipedia (WP) narrowed down manually by me as
> described.
> If there are not objections against the list itself, yes, putting these in
> the documentation as JSON sounds good.
> Frank and other proc maintainers - any issues/wishes for implementing this?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> xbiblio-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
