The document is now up at https://github.com/citation-style-language/governance/blob/master/governance.md and is mentioned at http://citationstyles.org/developers/#Development_Process.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Sebastian Karcher <karc...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Hi, > I've not received any further comments about this -- I think the document we > ended up with is quite nice: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NAqO2OfjaUZg2iEi4KvFkUiVcpcGCJVw9KnrBbBDYxk/edit?usp=sharing > > I would suggest that we adopt it unless there are objections by next Sunday, > May 10th (23:59 UTC for the sticklers). Some affirmative declarations of > support would also be great. > > To move the process forward, I'd also like to start with board nominations. > In its current form, the governance doc establishes a 4-member board. Bruce, > Frank, and Rintze have all indicated that they'd be happy/honored to serve > on the board, as would I. Are there any other people you'd like to nominate > (including, possibly, yourself)? I suggest the same one-week period until > next Sunday unless anyone feels that's too short. > > I'd assume that most people here know more or less who we are and, more > importantly, our various roles in CSL, but if there are any questions, we'd > be happy to answer those, too. > > Wishing everyone a great start into the week, > Sebastian > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Sebastian Karcher > <karc...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> >> Thanks for all the comments. >> I've incorporated most of them in the google doc, so please take another >> look. I think the mission statement could still be more expressive, so if >> someone has specific suggestions on that, that'd be great. >> As suggested I've removed the criteria for inclusion and moved them to the >> wiki: >> >> https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/wiki/Criteria-for-Inclusion >> with a link from contributing.md >> >> Best, >> Sebastian >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Rintze Zelle <rintze.ze...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Martin Fenner <m...@martinfenner.org> >>> wrote: >>> > * Cameron Neylon and Geoff Bilder have done a lot of work on >>> > „principles for >>> > open scholarly infrastructure“: >>> >>> Thanks. ORCID is a wholly different beast, though. Much larger budget, >>> actually has staff, has more institutional involvement, etc. But I >>> asked Cameron if he has a few main pointers >>> (https://twitter.com/rintzezelle/status/589837683444297728 and >>> https://twitter.com/rintzezelle/status/589838592685539328), and we >>> should definitely take a look at his writings. >>> >>> > * when ORCID started, the organization set up 10 principles >>> > (https://orcid.org/about/what-is-orcid/our-principles). They have been >>> > very >>> > helpful, and something like this could also be considered for the CSL >>> > project, e.g. at the beginning of the document. >>> >>> But that's basically just a way to write down the project's mission, >>> right? Regardless of format, are there any important 'principles' our >>> mission is currently missing? >>> >>> > * "We will always make the specification and citation styles freely >>> > available“. I suggest to me more specific and mention specific >>> > licenses, >>> > e.g. CC-BY-SA for content, and either "an OSI-approved open source >>> > license“ >>> > or a specific license such as MIT for code. >>> >>> Agreed. We should probably promise to use CC-BY-SA (or a less >>> restrictive license) for content, and MIT for CSL-developed code. >>> >>> > * two people feels like a small number for a board. >>> >>> Yeah, I wrote that since I didn't know if we would always be able to >>> find 4 people interested in sitting on the board. What if we don't? >>> Maybe not an issue if we keep the duties of the board light. >>> >>> > * „predatory publisher“ is a term I would avoid, as it sometimes >>> > difficult >>> > to define and possibly very political. >>> >>> I specifically decided not to mention Beall's list, since there is >>> some (valid) criticism on it, but you may be right that it's better to >>> avoid the term "predatory publishers" as well. I should also stress >>> that to date we actually have never refused a single styles based on >>> this criterion, and it might never come up. I'm not sure if it's >>> better to include a statement that we reserve the right to refuse >>> styles that wouldn't benefit the scientific community, or whether we >>> should just not discuss this (potential) issue at all. >>> >>> Rintze >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >>> exercises >>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >>> event?utm_ >>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >>> _______________________________________________ >>> xbiblio-devel mailing list >>> xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Karcher, PhD >> Department of Political Science >> Northwestern University > > > > > -- > Sebastian Karcher, PhD > Department of Political Science > Northwestern University > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
