Sebastian seems to have a solid grasp on the issues. I also often share his 
frustration with legal citations. Just so that everyone in the conversation 
knows what the deal is about legal citations, I have included some background.

Legal decisions are published in serial publications called "reporters". In the 
U.S. there are two main commercial reporters - LexisNexis and Westlaw - and a 
smattering of government reporters for various courts. The commercial reporters 
are objectively better. They are comprehensive, and they are heavily annotated; 
everyone I ever met in the profession uses either LexisNexis or Westlaw. 
However, reporters are expensive, and they consume a lot of space in an office, 
so law offices usually subscribe to either Lexis or Westlaw, but not both. 
Parallel citations were designed so that legal readers could benefit from 
reading a document, even if they had a different reporter than the one 
preferred by the writer. The practical importance of parallel citations is 
diminishing as the legal world moves into the digital environment, but parallel 
citations are still a requirement in many jurisdictions and journals.


What would my proposal look like in an actual CSL style? I am not an expert in 
CSL, but I'll give it my best shot. The most important use case for a "serials" 
variable is for parallel citations. I will show how an existing CSL style could 
be modified to add support for parallel citations.

My example is taken from "bluebook.csl". The excerpt below shows the styling 
instructions for creating the long form citation for legal opinions.

Bluebook.csl

      <else-if type="legal_case">
        <text variable="title" suffix=", " font-variant="normal"/>
        <text variable="number" suffix=", "/>
        <group delimiter=" ">
          <text variable="volume"/>
          <text variable="container-title"/>
          <text variable="page"/>
        </group>
        <text variable="locator" prefix=", "/>
        <group prefix=" (" suffix=")" delimiter=" ">
          <text variable="authority"/>
          <date variable="issued">
            <date-part name="month" form="short" suffix=" "/>
            <date-part name="day" suffix=", "/>
            <date-part name="year"/>
          </date>
        </group>
      </else-if>


My proposed modification would be to allow CSL styles to encapsulate essential 
information about a serial publication within a <serials> element. The 
<serials> block would have one or more <serial> children which contained the 
text variables.

Modified-Bluebook.csl

      <else-if type="legal_case">
        <text variable="title" suffix=", " font-variant="normal"/>
        <text variable="number" suffix=", "/>
        <serials variable="reporter">
           <serial delimiter=", " >
                <group delimiter=" ">
                    <text variable="volume"/>
                    <text variable="container-title"/>
                    <text variable="page"/>
                </group>
              <text variable="locator" prefix=", "/>
           </serial>
        </serials>
        <group prefix=" (" suffix=")" delimiter=" ">
          <text variable="authority"/>
          <date variable="issued">
            <date-part name="month" form="short" suffix=" "/>
            <date-part name="day" suffix=", "/>
            <date-part name="year"/>
          </date>
        </group>
      </else-if>


There are two things that I want to point out about the modified-bluebook.csl. 
One, parallel citations are separated by commas, so the <serial> element has a 
delimiter attribute.

Two, the "locator" text variable has to be inside the <serial> element - which 
is something I did not consider in my first post. Each parallel citation has to 
have its own "pincite" or "locator".

A citation rendered with the modified-bluebook styling would appear as follows.

"Czapinski v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2000 WI 80, 86, 236 Wis. 2d 316, 319, 
613 N.W.2d 120, 122. (Wis. 2000)"

In closing:

I recognize that CSL should not adopt any changes that are not supported by the 
major stakeholders. However, I am very interested in your feedback on the 
technical merits of the proposal.

- Tom O'Reilly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to