On 21/10/11 07:53, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote:

> no, then you misunderstood. the point of the last mail was that the
> dharma version number *has* to stay lower than the eden version
> number. this to ensure that any user updating from dharma to eden get
> the new version.

aha. i see. well I guess this will be ok since I don't plan to do
anything more with the dharma version. So regarding version numbers, you
have no preference over 2 or 3 parts?

Best Regards

Jools

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn 
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Xbmc-addons mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons

Reply via email to