(It must be stablle, though; 4.2.7 was stable...) Furthermore, 'gift wrapping' xboard in a script seems a dead-end route to me.There is nothing that you cannot do with shell scripts, sh is a recursive programming language. But we don't want xboard to become a scripted GUI. If there is important functionality that it lacks, we should implement it in the C code, not cloak it inscripting.
I tend to agree: this version was meant as a merge only, not for adding ne
features.
XBoard is still so far behind WinBoard that we easily could spend a year
programming
to get it upto standards. We'd better resist that urge. I think what we
have now is a very
clear improvement over what people are used to with 4.2.7. That should be
enough.
- [XBoard-devel] beta version Arun Persaud
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Eric Mullins
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version h.g. muller
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Tim Mann
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Tim Mann
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Eric Mullins
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version h.g. muller
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Eric Mullins
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Arun Persaud
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version h.g. muller
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Eric Mullins
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta versi... Eric Mullins
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta versi... h.g. muller
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta versi... Eric Mullins
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta versi... h.g. muller
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta versi... Arun Persaud
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta versi... Arun Persaud
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version Tim Mann
- Re: [XBoard-devel] gtk-version Arun Persaud
- Re: [XBoard-devel] gtk-version h . g . muller
