Hi Tim Mann wrote: > Hmm, why aren't we including the WinBoard-only sources in the tarball > too? I don't see a reason to remove them. Arun? > > On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:53:36 +0100, "h.g. muller" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I see that the source tar ball we now offer from the GNU download section >> is not the same as the one in the git repository, but is now completely >> cleansed of WinBoard sources. I had not really planned on distributing >> sources from the WinBoard forum, so people that were looking for them >> are now looking in the wrong place, and complaining about it.
oops. I'll add them back. Guess they were kicked out when I rewrote parts of the configure mechanism and nobody caught it up to now... I'll add the winboard directory back in, so that it will be included in a "make distcheck". Guess I'll release a 4.4.1a for this by latest this weekend with just the winboard sources added (might have time today, but should be able to do it on the weekend for sure). >> As an aside: I see now that the Shogi bitmaps are included in the root of >> the tar ball (and have thus ended up in the XBoard-only distribution), >> while these are simply duplicats of those in the winboard/shogibitmaps >> directory. They are not used in building XBoard, and even have the wrong >> format for that. (They are Windows .bmp files.) so xboard/shogibitmaps can be deleted from git and we keep only xboard/winboard/shogibitmaps? ARUN
