Hi > I am not sure if it still makes sense to maintain separate 'stable' and > 'development' branches. This made sense when we were doing large-scale > refactoring in the master branch, which would take a long time to be > presentable, and in the mean time would need a way to fix the occasional > bug that was reported. > > For the near feature it seems that we should integrate gtk3 into master, > and that already is in a separate branch. I hardly ever touched the v4.8.x > branch, so I guess we can live without a v4.9.x.
OK. I left everything on master for the moment... I think in principle it is still a good idea to create a v4.9.x branch, since you never know if something larger might come up ;) and I also think using v4.8.x and merging it back into master when needed worked well. Arun
