I don't know if this is a tip because I am still learning a lot about this subject.  
However, I think you might want to pay attention to what you are eating before you go 
skiing.  My understanding, please take as very limited, is that you do not want to 
have a lot of sugar in your blood before you start a race. Apparently, this will cause 
your body to start burning into your glycogen stores too quickly.  You might also want 
to be careful with your start as a too fast start will also get your body burning 
glycogen too quickly.  I think that the basic idea is to start of slow and smooth 
(maybe some nice slow pre-race warm-ups) and get your body into a fat burning cycle.  
As the race progresses, your body will use up these other “fat”? stores and convert 
into the glycogen burning which you can sort of replace with all of the energy 
drinks/gu's and stuff.  Apparently once you start into this glycogen cycle you can't 
get back to burning the other stuff and you will at some point bonk if your glycogen 
stores run too low.  Some people may also need to pay attention, especially me, to 
eating a lot of bananas because the potassium? In the bananas apparently helps prevent 
cramping.

I am still learning a lot about this stuff and have read every e-mail with interest.  
I have a very limited understanding of this subject and would appreciate any 
corrections to what I Have just said.  I am also attaching a ski-post from last year 
that discusses the glycemic index.

Jim Johnston

Glycemic Buzz

The last skipost regarding getting happily to the finish of a race brought
quite a few emails.  It seems more than a few out there are coming to grief
with 10km or so to go.  I think training, pre-race prep and pacing are
perhaps most important, and should be looked at before secretes like the
coke/coffee combo, or which sports drink is best, etc are taken into account
(though they are also good to explore).
Fuel is however very important.
There has been a lot of buzz lately about the glycemic index.  The glycemic
index (GI) ranks foods based their effect on blood glucose levels.  It's
been a tool of diabetics for some time, and has caught on as a tool of
sports performance.  It should be noted that most of the GI research has so
far been done on non-athletic folks and there is a big difference between
what our bodies do with carbos and what a more sedentary person's body does
with them.
A food that raises the blood glucose rapidly has a high glycemic index.  The
idea is that one should avoid eating high GI foods before a competition so
as not to create a drop in sugar levels while racing, but to use them during
and after a race or training to maintain and replenish glycogen supplies
quickly.
I think that this can be fairly helpful, but that there is more to it, and
that as is the case with many performance related things, you have to
experiment with it for yourself.  There are no rules.
Some things to keep in mind when using the GI is that one food will affect
different people very differently; also, how it is prepared and how long it
is cooked can seriously affect its GI ranking.  How much is eaten also comes
into play, as does what it is eaten with, when it is eaten (empty or full
stomach, after training, before…), as well as other factors.
My personal experience is that these variables make using the GI alone as a
performance tool unreliable, and I am fairly sensitive to blood sugar
levels.  However, I know others who find it quite helpful.
In the end, I think that checking out a list of high vs. low GI foods
(readily available on the net among other places) is a good idea, and that
taking that information and experimenting with the consumption of different
types of food before, during and after an event may get some people a few
more km down the trail.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 

Sent:   Sunday, February 16, 2003 12:09 PM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        [XC] Birkie Nutrition

Hello Folks-
Since i imagine a whole bunch of you will be going up to the Birkie next
weekend and may be dealing with this very issue--i wanted to throw this
dilemma and question your way-- nutrition related.

So, there probably is a very simple answer to this, but i seem to have the
darndest time staying hydrated and fed while skiing long distance... (As a
former collegiate cyclist--i dont recall this same problem, so i am intrigued)

Case in point--i skied 3 hours yesterday--40k and come the last 10k, i was
feeling downright crummy--and not just because of fitness--legs were a
little heavy, but ok. During those three hours i drank 2 16oz bottles of
water, a granola bar, and 2 power gels. I get back to the lodge and am
fried/lethargic/borderline nauseous--low blood sugar? At first, i thought
it was for being out of shape, but after a couple of bottles of water, more
food, etc, i perk back up-(after 20 minutes maybe)-- to the point where i
feel tired, but fine. I think it is a serious question of depletion of
electrolytes/energy--but for some reason, i just cant get the food/water
combo down. Skiing in the cold weather, on hills, with wind, SUCKS calories, so i
understand i need to eat--and i "suffer" from a huge metablism and low body
fat...  Do any of you long term, long distance Birkie skiers have any
suggestions? What works, what doesn't?  I have told myself that i will stop
at every aid station and DRINK at EAT... but what to eat?

Thanks for any tips you might have... Coach Don?

Cheers,

>From back in wave 5.

Eric


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ University of Wisconsin-Madison M.S. Urban and Regional 
Planning
M.S. Candidate Institute for Environmental Studies 925 Bascom Mall 110 Music Hall 
Madison, WI 53706 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
http://www.MadNorSki.org/
XC mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/xc

 << File: ENVELOPE.TXT >> _______________________________________________
http://www.MadNorSki.org/
XC mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/xc

Reply via email to