Thanks Lissa!

Would you happen to know if any of these changes actually specifically 
changed the getdestiny/nextdestiny behavior?



On 7/25/2011 10:34 AM, Lissa Valletta wrote:
> Since xCAT 2.3 has not been supported for a while.   I would suggest you
> upgrade at least to 2.5,  a supported release.  There have been tremendous
> changes in xCAT from 2.3.   If you do the upgrade should be automatic, your
> database will be migrated, etc.    One thing you might need to do since
> your release is so old,  is after the upgrade,  manually stop the xcatd and
> make sure all processes are cleaned up and then restart it.  Also, if you
> have service node,  make sure they are upgraded also.
>
> Lissa K. Valletta
> 2-3/T12
> Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
> (tie 293) 433-3102
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Russell Jones<[email protected]>
> To:   xCAT Users Mailing list<[email protected]>
> Date: 07/25/2011 11:27 AM
> Subject:      [xcat-user] nextdestiny behavior, slow response
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> When adding a cluster to our network, we are getting slow responses from
> what appears to be getdestiny/nextdestiny on our xCAT 2.3 cluster, and I
> was wondering if any enhancements / changes have been made in 2.6 to
> this behavior?
>
> The steps of replicating the problem (and how we add a cluster):
>
> * Rack and cable up, power on
> * Run getmacs
> * Add cluster nodes to other required tables (we have a custom script
> that does this)
> * makedhcp for the cluster
> * nodeset cluster runcmd=bmcsetup
> * Power cycle nodes
>
> At this point, as the nodes begin asking the management node for
> getdestiny/nextdestiny, the management node begins to become very slow
> in responding to the getdestiny/nextdestiny requests. We are only
> talking about 30 to 35 nodes at a time, and it happens when the nodes
> boot nbfs and get their commands to run bmcsetup. We also see a perl
> process consistently using 100% of a CPU core during this time. What is
> the process of how these nodes are pulling this data? Obviously it's
> getting it from the chain table, but what could cause this response to
> be so resource hungry and slow?
>
> Also, we are looking to upgrade from 2.3 to 2.6. Has there been any
> changes to this process that could assist in correcting this behavior?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Storage Efficiency Calculator
> This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
> has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
> ments, worldwide.  Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to
> the right place. Try It Now!
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
> _______________________________________________
> xCAT-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Storage Efficiency Calculator
> This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
> has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
> ments, worldwide.  Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to
> the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
> _______________________________________________
> xCAT-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
ments, worldwide.  Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to 
the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
_______________________________________________
xCAT-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user

Reply via email to