Just curious, I noticed that even when a compute node is set to only use,
for example, "service01" as their service node, the other service nodes
still seem to be sent commands for that node.
Example:
[root@mn ~]# lsdef c1n01
Object name: c1n01
arch=x86_64
bmc=c1n01-bmc
bmcport=0
chain=runcmd=standby
currchain=boot
currstate=netboot centos5.5-x86_64-compute
groups=compute,all,ipmi
initrd=xcat/netboot/centos5.5/x86_64/compute/initrd-stateless.gz
installnic=eth0
interface=eth0
ip=192.168.1.2
kcmdline=imgurl=http://!myipfn!/install/netboot/centos5.5/x86_64/compute/rootimg.gz
XCAT=!myipfn!:3001 ifname=eth0:00:50:56:11:11:15 netdev=eth0
kernel=xcat/netboot/centos5.5/x86_64/compute/kernel
mac=00:50:56:11:11:15
mgt=ipmi
netboot=pxe
nfsserver=mn
nodetype=osi
ondiscover=nodediscover
os=centos5.5
postbootscripts=otherpkgs
postscripts=updaterepos.sh,syslog,remoteshell,syncfiles
power=ipmi
primarynic=eth0
profile=compute
provmethod=netboot
servicenode=service01
status=booted
statustime=10-11-2011 12:13:27
[root@mn ~]# nodeset c1n01 netboot
Error: Unable to dispatch hierarchical sub-command to service02:3001. This
service node may be down or its xcatd daemon may not be responding.
c1n01: netboot centos5.5-x86_64-compute
As you can see, c1n01 has "service01" only as its service node, but the
management node is still trying to talk to service02 about this command. Is
this expected behavior, or have I misconfigured something?
Thanks!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
xCAT-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user
