That was already the case (IP of mgt1 and IP of mgt[2] are the forwarders).
I don't believe it will forward requests within the zones that it is 
authoritative.
I ended up using tabdump to recreate the hosts and nodelist tables. Mostly good.

Now the problem of the day is fixing the SSH credentials so that all the 
diskless nodes booting off the
new frontend can get root access to all the nodes still booted off the old 
frontend.  Need this
especially for GPFS.  I've been trying to follow what's going on in the 
remoteshell postscript,
and I'm wondering if my "sitespecific" postscript is running before 
"remoteshell" is competed.
Is there a way to determine/force the order the postscripts are executed?  
Sitespecific is after
remoteshell both in alphabet and in the lsdef output. 
The basic problem is that mmsdrrestore fails during sitespecific, but works 
fine when I try it again later by hand.

 -- ddj
Dave Johnson
Brown University

> On Feb 7, 2017, at 4:32 AM, Er Tao Zhao <erta...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, David
>  
> Will you pls try 'chdef -t site forwarders=<ip_of_mgt1>' and then 'makedns' 
> to use mgt1 as your remote DNS server.
> Pls feel free to let me know if there is any more issues.
>  
> Thx!
> Best Regards,
> -----------------------------------
> Zhao Er Tao
> 
> IBM China System and Technology Laboratory, Beijing
> Tel:(86-10)82450485
> Email: erta...@cn.ibm.com
> Address: 1/F, 28 Building,ZhongGuanCun Software Park,
> No.8 DongBeiWang West Road, Haidian District,
> Beijing, 100193, P.R.China
>  
>  
> ----- Original message -----
> From: "David D. Johnson" <david_john...@brown.edu>
> To: "xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net" <xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Cc:
> Subject: [xcat-user] upgrading xCAT onto new servers
> Date: Sat, Feb 4, 2017 3:04 AM
>  
> We’re upgrading cluster mgt node hardware and software at the same time, 
> going from 2.8.3 to 2.13.1,
> and from centos6.7 to rhels7.2.   I have the new frontend installed and 
> somewhat functional.
> Right now I’m needing to clone the DNS / named from “mgt1” that is still 
> authoritative for the production cluster.
> I could just tabdump hosts and nodelist and do makedns on “mgt5”, or I’m 
> thinking there might be a way to make
> the new mgt5 a slave to the existing named running on mgt1.   Any pros/cons?  
> What would you do?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  — ddj
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot 
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
> _______________________________________________
> xCAT-user mailing list
> xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user>
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! 
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
> xCAT-user mailing list
> xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
xCAT-user mailing list
xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user

Reply via email to