FYI, to share my perspective, it's biased since my work is confluent.

Generally, confluent will tend to 'rhyme with' xCAT a bit more.  I was a big 
part of xCAT 2's design and that carried over as a baseline for confluent.  It 
is different, but in ways that I think we got right, it'll be similar.

The noderange syntax and behavior is very similar (confluent adds pagination 
and a few more syntax things).  The concept of groups and inheritance with 
formulaic values is similar (though using syntax like {node}-bmc instead of 
|$|-bmc| and 192.168.{n1}.{n2} instead of |192.168.($1).($2)|.)

The OS profiles are where things really start to deviate.  In confluent, a 
profile is a pure filesystem thing.  Adding a postscript is a matter of 
symlinking or adding a file to 
/var/lib/confluent/public/os/{profile}/scripts/post.d/, rather than modifying a 
table.  We continue to implement diskless, cloning, and scripted install of 
Autoyast/subiquity/anaconda.

It doesn't require a DHCP server, but it can also more easily coexist with 
uncoordinated DHCP servers.

Everything is built upon an API that is always mapped to REST, and we are 
working towards releasing a UI to actually take advantage of it for those that 
want a UI for usage or for some big display.  There is a WebUI today, but it is 
kind of bare bones, and a rewritten UI is coming that covers more of the 
functionality (though CLI and API are going to remain the only way to get to 
all functionality).

It's a bit more concerned about security, which sounds good, though sometimes 
it can be a little picky in weird ways. Like requiring a setting global to 
opt-in to PXE support even though pretty much everyone would want that setting. 
 Our security team has been pretty adamant about explicit opt in, so we do it, 
but it's not too bad.  SSH is now handled with certificate authorities instead 
of passing/sharing private host keys, and host based authentication for node to 
node ssh (a bit more flexible than passing user key around and 'zoning').  
HTTPS is also well enabled, with nodes all having the appropriate certificate 
authority provisioned.  Diskless images are encrypted and node TPMs are used 
for diskless usage so that node credentials are better protected.

Another complication is that there's several more ways to start.  You can PXE 
boot and collect mac addresses, but you can also do BMC driven discovery 
instead, or just add BMCs manually and run 'nodeinventory nodes -s' to get 
there. Which is nice, but requires better documentation so you don't end up 
wasting time with an approach you don't like.

The biggest problems is that we haven't made ourselves as readily reachable 
(mostly wondering where people want us reachable, Matrix or a forum or...) and 
we have struggled to make navigable documentation (which is part lack of 
sufficient effort, and frankly not very good at retaining a fresh perspective 
for new users). Also, while it does work with various vendor equipment, I'm the 
lead and work for Lenovo, and that may be a concern for some folks who don't 
want hardware vendors writing their management software, or at least don't want 
Lenovo doing it.

Mostly I hear about alternatives that are about OS deployment, so not as many 
as concerned with deep BMC operation. So I think that's something that I think 
confluent is uniquely similar to xCAT (though more so, e.g. nodeconfig can 
modify UEFI settings on Lenovo, Dell, HPE, and others). Other than that, I 
can't give a good objective opinion, since of course I'll like confluent more 
since it's exactly what I want it to be.

I think I'll pivot to more documentation and videos after we get the WebUI 
rewrite out, and use that as one of the options for easier guided onboarding 
for people to get started.  I'll maintain CLI-only of course, as that's a bit 
more my style, but I'm hoping the GUI can alleviate the rough edges for those 
that appreciate it.
________________________________
From: Noah, Stuart via xCAT-user <xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 5:11 PM
To: xCAT Users Mailing list <xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Noah, Stuart <stuart.n...@csmc.edu>
Subject: Re: [xcat-user] [External] Re: xCAT Consortium Update


Hi Brian,



What is your opinion of Confluent?



The message threads lately seem to indicate that that the direction is to 
migrate folks to that rather than continue releases of Xcat…



We have our new cluster on Bright, but that is a cash hog…  and overkill for 
the development environment that we are currently redesigning.



Thanks,



Stu



From: Russell Jones <arjone...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2024 7:40 AM
To: xCAT Users Mailing list <xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [External] Re: [xcat-user] xCAT Consortium Update



For what it's worth all, I headed up migrating the company I work for to 
Warewulf. There's a bit of a learning curve because it does things quite 
differently, but the documentation is decent and the developers are very active 
in their

For what it's worth all, I headed up migrating the company I work for to 
Warewulf. There's a bit of a learning curve because it does things quite 
differently, but the documentation is decent and the developers are very active 
in their Slack channel and receptive to helping when you get stuck.... and 
there were several things I got stuck on :-) One is we needed to be able to 
support multiple networks from a single manager just like xCAT (warewulf 
doesn't have that capability out of the box). The developers helped, and it was 
totally doable with some minor configuration file edits.



Another "major" thing is you are on your own for writing your own systemd 
script to launch postscripts after a node boots. Warewulf does not have a 
built-in capability for postscripts. Again, totally doable.



I would recommend moving to Warewulf.



On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 1:20 PM Glick, Bill 
<bgl...@illinois.edu<mailto:bgl...@illinois.edu>> wrote:

Thank you, Markus.



I want to apologize for the tone of my original email. You had given an update 
about this on May 10, 
2024<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/sourceforge.net/p/xcat/mailman/message/58770579/__;!!KOmnBZxC8_2BBQ!3BDzbG93wbVijU0gAjAOFnVSIVYSX71pqAYb4UgJAciajsalv8A98jWYpm4rigz6kC73dc-lQ6WphbxwCFyB$>,
 but I was having trouble locating that when I sent this latest enquiry.



I have been using the last development 
release<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/xcat.org/files/xcat/repos/yum/devel/core-snap/__;!!DZ3fjg!4r59aVCvn4jsWNCCrHAh6xyrgu5mx6BI9J0SxQ-d0TGtijvuu86F-dHJdhhvulngQh7UVfY6X1ZJUe-x7E-_X1DEjgU$>
 for the last week. It is working well for us. Thanks!



- Bill Glick







From: Markus Hilger 
<markus.hil...@megware.com<mailto:markus.hil...@megware.com>>
Date: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 at 10:56 AM
To: Glick, Bill <bgl...@illinois.edu<mailto:bgl...@illinois.edu>>, xCAT Users 
Mailing list 
<xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: AW: xCAT Consortium Update

Hi Bill,



yes, we are still here :)

However, as we are all only following the project on the side, things are 
sometimes progressing a little slower than we would like.



The current plan is to release 
2.17<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/xcat2/xcat-core/milestone/53__;!!DZ3fjg!4r59aVCvn4jsWNCCrHAh6xyrgu5mx6BI9J0SxQ-d0TGtijvuu86F-dHJdhhvulngQh7UVfY6X1ZJUe-x7E-_I0DJmgo$>
 before Supercomputing this year. The codebase is ready, and the last 
development 
release<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/xcat.org/files/xcat/repos/yum/devel/core-snap/__;!!DZ3fjg!4r59aVCvn4jsWNCCrHAh6xyrgu5mx6BI9J0SxQ-d0TGtijvuu86F-dHJdhhvulngQh7UVfY6X1ZJUe-x7E-_X1DEjgU$>
 is what 2.17 will be.

So, anyone is welcome to use it already. You don't have to wait for an 
"official release".



We might want to hold another BoF session at Supercomputing. But we are still 
finalizing the details.



Nevertheless, I would like to mention again that xCAT itself has no long-term 
future. We do not recommend using xCAT for new clusters that may want to 
upgrade to newer operating systems such as RHEL 10.

The project is only in maintenance mode. We will provide a small fix here and 
there for existing installations but there will be no major new development or 
regular releases.

We are happy to merge pull requests though.



For new deployments we recommend using 
confluent<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/xcat2/confluent__;!!DZ3fjg!4r59aVCvn4jsWNCCrHAh6xyrgu5mx6BI9J0SxQ-d0TGtijvuu86F-dHJdhhvulngQh7UVfY6X1ZJUe-x7E-_IdZDBVg$>
 instead.





​Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards



Markus Hilger



HPC Engineer



MEGWARE Computer Vertrieb und Service GmbH

Tel:          +49 3722 528-47



Nordstraße 19

markus.hil...@megware.com<mailto:markus.hil...@megware.com>



09247 Chemnitz-Röhrsdorf, Germany

www.megware.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.megware.com/__;!!DZ3fjg!4r59aVCvn4jsWNCCrHAh6xyrgu5mx6BI9J0SxQ-d0TGtijvuu86F-dHJdhhvulngQh7UVfY6X1ZJUe-x7E-_gOWqpSY$>



Geschäftsführer: André Singer, Dr. Axel Auweter





Amtsgericht: Chemnitz HRB 584



________________________________

Von: Glick, Bill <bgl...@illinois.edu<mailto:bgl...@illinois.edu>>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2024 18:13
An: xCAT Users Mailing list 
<xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>>; 
Markus Hilger <markus.hil...@megware.com<mailto:markus.hil...@megware.com>>
Betreff: Re: xCAT Consortium Update



Any news or updates regarding the xCAT Consortium?

Did discussion move to some new place? Or are we to presume the xCAT Consortium 
is defunct?



- Bill Glick



From: Glick, Bill <bgl...@illinois.edu<mailto:bgl...@illinois.edu>>
Date: Thursday, May 2, 2024 at 10:33 AM
To: xCAT Users Mailing list 
<xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [xcat-user] xCAT Consortium Update

How is the xCAT Consortium effort going?

I had the impression we’d hear approximately monthly updates about its 
progress, but I haven’t seen any updates since this message in December.



- Bill Glick





From: Markus Hilger 
<markus.hil...@megware.com<mailto:markus.hil...@megware.com>>
Date: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 11:07 AM
To: xCAT Users Mailing list 
<xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: [xcat-user] xCAT Consortium Update

Dear xCAT community,



it is one month ago, since we met at Supercomputing ’23 to announce that a 
consortium led by RedLine, OCF and MEGWARE is willing to take over the 
ownership of the current xCAT project to provide continuity for existing xCAT 2 
based clusters. And we are still thrilled having seen so many of you during 
this event who have shown their interest and support, both in presence and 
online.



On the technical side, we have started to dive into the IBM-internal 
integration setup for compiling and testing xCAT releases. Our goal is to 
replicate and extend this infrastructure at RedLine, OCF and MEGWARE to provide 
even wider test coverage on more hardware infrastructures for future releases. 
At the same time, we continue to investigate the various legal aspects of the 
transition.



During our SC’23 meeting, we have also announced that in addition to our 
efforts surrounding xCAT 2, we would work with LENOVO towards making Confluent 
a suitable, community backed, xCAT 2 replacement for future cluster systems. 
For this reason, we invited LENOVO to become a full member of our consortium 
from the beginning. Understandably, this plan is a significant step for the 
Confluent team that requires thorough preparation and careful consideration and 
we will share further updates as this effort takes shape.



We would also like to take this opportunity to thank the team at IBM, namely 
Nathan A Besaw, for their continued support during the transition.





​Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards



Markus Hilger



HPC Engineer



MEGWARE Computer Vertrieb und Service GmbH

Tel:          +49 3722 528-47



Nordstraße 19

markus.hil...@megware.com<mailto:markus.hil...@megware.com>



09247 Chemnitz-Röhrsdorf, Germany

www.megware.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.megware.com/__;!!DZ3fjg!408lxur06Jk8-bQWQGKw6CU6hJUpB8yNM9CuibvOFzrB8wxMVavWBFshC-oqQggakVDDlr1jpM49BBSszZMCWMo_ObU$>



Geschäftsführer: André Singer, Axel Auweter





Amtsgericht: Chemnitz HRB 584



_______________________________________________
xCAT-user mailing list
xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user__;!!KOmnBZxC8_2BBQ!3BDzbG93wbVijU0gAjAOFnVSIVYSX71pqAYb4UgJAciajsalv8A98jWYpm4rigz6kC73dc-lQ6WphXb-0FnO$>


IMPORTANT WARNING: This message is intended for the use of the person or entity 
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and 
confidential, the disclosure of which is governed by applicable law. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is 
strictly prohibited. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
xCAT-user mailing list
xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user

Reply via email to