> In many languages I’d agree with you. But C++ has a very explicit design 
> principle of not adding extra overhead unless you ask for it. If you want the 
> more powerful (but slower) behavior of virtual methods (inheritance, etc.) 
> you have to explicitly say “virtual”; otherwise a method call is implemented 
> just like a regular C function call.

I think that final sentence might be the crux of the philosophical disconnect. 
Several times in this thread you've made reference to non-guaranteed 
implementation as if it were canonical. You seem to have promoted "everybody 
does it this way as far as I know" to "this is how it is supposed to be done."
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (Xcode-users@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to