On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 11:15 -0700, seanb wrote: > HI > I just pulled the src.rpm from sourceforge, ran "alien" to make it a > tar.gz, untarred and applied the patch that was included, and tried it. > I don't get that error. I do get a different one (something in libelf is > sad). If I do a "make LIBELF=0" it seems to work. > I'm an Ubuntu user, so I understand the rpm issue. I don't recall it > being hard to have sourceforge generate tar.gz's from the subversion > tree. Anyone?
Yes, it's quite easy to generate the tarball from SF's svn tree: http://xcpu.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/xcpu/xcpu2/trunk.tar.gz?view=tar (for the xcpu2 trunk) we had this feature with the old repositories too. > > Sean > > Roger Mason wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to install xcpu using the instructions at > > http://xcpu.org/man.html. The process fails thus: > > > > make xcpu-tarball > > ... > > > > make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/onesis/xcpu2/libxcpu' > > cc -Wall -g -I ../include -I../spfs/include -c command.c > > command.c: In function 'xp_command_treespawn': > > command.c:149: warning: unused variable 'buf' > > command.c: In function 'xp_command_exec': > > command.c:262: warning: implicit declaration of function > > 'spc_get_local_address' > > command.c:262: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 4 > > has type 'int' > > command.c:262: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 4 > > has type 'int' > > command.c: In function 'xp_commands_wait': > > command.c:341: error: too few arguments to function 'spcfd_add' > > command.c:345: error: too few arguments to function 'spcfd_add' > > command.c:350: error: too few arguments to function 'spcfd_add' > > command.c:356: error: too few arguments to function 'spcfd_add' > > make[2]: *** [command.o] Error 1 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/onesis/xcpu2/libxcpu' > > make[1]: *** [libstrutil/libstrutil.a] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/onesis/xcpu2' > > make: *** [xcpu2/xcpufs/xcpufs.static] Error 2 > > > > I see there is an xcpu rpm on sourceforge. Is rpm now the preferred > > mode of installation? I'm on a non-rpm based distro (gentoo). > > > > Cheers, > > Roger > >
