Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]> writes: > Can I ask the stupid question of what behavior is different with ssh? > It seems like ssh is a subset of xcpu functionality so why couldn't > that look/feel be provided side-by-side? (disclaimer: I don't > understand why someone would want ssh functionality, but I don't see > where xcpu falls short of that)
I think the core of compatibility is rsh actually. There are tons of programs automation and other things that work by assuming you can say <prefix cmd> <command to run on other machine>. Eric
