Hello, some weeks ago we also tested the Dell againsg my more than 10
years old Ipaq 3950. The test was very easy, we went out from the shop
with the Dell, then compared to the Ipaq. Simple conclusion: the old Ipaq
is far much better outside, while the Dell is much better inside, so I am
still using the Ipaq.
Istvan CSONKA
HUNGARY
From: Ian <ian-xcs...@zsd.co.za>
To: xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 2011.06.20 14:37
Subject: [Xcsoar-user] Evaluating sunlight readability
Hi All
I bought an hx4700 a while back because it was reportedly one of the
best of its generation with regards to sunlight readability. But quit
frankly once I had it installed and wired I discovered its readability
during flight is still not adequate. I previously flew with a low cost
GPS and then a Palm V mounted in the cockpit which also had their
display limitations so I have experienced this before. The information
provided by XCsoar is so useful, I would never fly without the hx4700.
It is just sad that sometimes when I scan the panel I miss some of the
details on the PDA.
Now I am considering upgrading to the Dell Streak, and actively looking
for alternatives, because the Dell is reported to have significantly
better sunlight readability than the hx4700. But when I read the
reports, it is obvious that sunlight readability is very subjective.
What looks good in the shop and during a casual walk outside does not
always cut it when you mount the device is in a glider cockpit and go
flying.
So I figure we should design a means of evaluating sunlight readability
so we can compare our experiences in a semi-scientific manner. I took my
hx4700 out into the sun yesterday and danced around with it a while and
came up with the following:
PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SUNLIGHT READABILITY OF A PDA DEVICE FOR
GLIDING PURPOSES:
1) Requirements:
- PDA, PNA, Tablet Computer, smart cell phone or other device to test,
with enough battery charge.
- XCSoar software, loaded with terrain maps and turn points, or
alternate mapping software, like Google maps.
- An outdoor location with direct, bright sunlight.
- Gliding sunglasses and optionally a gliding hat or peaked cap.
2) Preparation:
- Start up a XCsoar on the device, demo mode may prove useful if it is
not located in an area covered by your maps and connected to a GPS.
(Otherwise use alternate mapping software like Google Maps). Make sure
you have some coloured features, like terrain markings, as well as some
text details, like turn point or street labels, clearly visible on the
screen.
- Ensure that the PDA backlight is on full brightness and will maintain
that setting for several minutes during the evaluation.
- Put on your sunglasses and optionally your hat.
3) Test Positions:
Take the device out into the sun and assess it in the following 5
positions. In each position the device should be held at arms length,
with the screen pointing directly back at your eyes.
Position A: Sun shining over your shoulder such that the shadow of your
head falls just to one side of the device and the device is in full
sunlight. If it has a reflective screen, the reflection of the sun
should shine on your neck or chin, just below your eyes.
Position E: Hold the device up in front of the sun so the shadow of the
device blocks the sun from shining directly into your eyes. Be careful
not to look directly into the sun. Wearing a gliding hat or peaked cap
allows you to shade your eyes from the sun with the brim of your hat
while you are positioning the device.
Position C: Rotate your arms in an ark to a point midway between point 1
and point 5. Hold the device at right angles to the sun so that it
shines across the screen and small adjustments would put in in either
shade or sunlight.
Position B: Rotate your arms in the ark to a point midway between
Position A and Position C. There should be direct sunlight falling on
the screen.
Position D: Rotate your arms in the ark to a point midway between
Position C and Position E. The screen should be in shadow.
Note I have described the positions in an order which easiest to
understand. Once you know what you are doing it is very easy to go
through them in alphabetic (ie positional) order.
4) Test Procedure:
Line up the device in the required position and then tilt it slightly to
minimize the effects of reflections etc. Move it up to 15 degrees left
or right and/or up or down while maintaining the relative positions of
the sun, your eyes and the device until you have the best visibility.
Hold the position and look away at some details on the horizon for
several seconds. Then glance back at the device for 2 seconds. Read some
black text details, like turn point labels (or street names) on the map,
and then look at colour features like terrain shading. Assign a score
from 5 down to 1 for the visibility of the details. The score should be
similar to the 5 to 1 score one uses to report on a radio test
transmission, ie:
5: Clearly visible
4: Some distortion, but still clearly visible.
3: Significant distortion, but still visible.
2. Lots of distortion, barely visible.
1. Total distortion, information not discernible.
Separate scores should be assigned for black text and colour features.
Finally make a note how high the sun is above the horizon. This will
give others an indication of how bright the conditions were during your
assessment.
To test the above I tried it with the following devices:
- My HP Compaq hx4700.
- A college's htc Desire smart phone. (Google shows that this phone came
out with two models of screen, AMOLED and SLCD. There is no definitive
way to determine which is installed. The original packing does not state
AMOLED, which suggests it is SLCD but the test results indicate
otherwise).
- My well used Nokia 6110 Navigator cell phone.
- My Casio black and white digital watch. (Top of the line for a plastic
digital watch, but still not an exotic watch).
I logged these results:
Colour visibility
Position A B C D E
hx4700 5 4 2 2 1
htc Desire 1 4 3 3 2
Nokia 6110 nav 1 3 2 2 2
Black/white visibility
Position A B C D E
hx4700 5 4 2 2 1
htc Desire 1 4 3 3 2
Nokia 6110 nav 4 3 2 2 2
Casio digital watch 5 5 5 5 5
This was in sunny but winter weather in Cape Town with the sun about 35
to 40 deg above the horizon.
The most interesting comparison is Position A, with the sun shining
directly onto the screen. My hx4700 reads 5, but the htc is a 1. My
Nokia goes black and white.
In position B both the hx4700 and the htc are clearly visible.
The "shade" positions, C, D and E test the strength of the back
lighting. The htc is better than the others.
Clearly the limitation of the hx4700 is the strength of the back light
when it is contrasted with a very bright sky as a background.
As a comparison I tested my Casio black and white digital watch. It
scored "5" in every position for black text (but obviously no colour
scores). Interestingly when the face was in shadow it was just as
legible as in sunlight - but it looked different, as if the white
background has the ability to reflect ambient light even when in shadow.
I would appreciate it if others could attempt the above test with
different devices. Please give feedback on the devices you test as well
as comments and suggestions on the test procedure. It would be very good
if people could test multiple devices and give feedback on them so that
the relative sunlight readability of different devices can be accessed.
If others see the usefulness in this idea, I am happy to post it up on a
wiki somewhere. We can keep a log of test results on the same wiki.
Thanks
Ian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
