dragging the finger into any direction on the map it currently used to draw gestures for zooming in/out, opening the waypoint list or analysis, and so on. implementing your suggestion is possible but that would mean giving up on the gestures and I don't think we should do that...
Turbo 2012/6/22 Peter Kovari <p.kov...@sbcglobal.net>: > Speaking of the GO-TO features; by all means I'm not a developer, not even > close, and only understand what is or is not user friendly and easily > accessible. > There is a nice feature in WinPilot and I also think in SeeYou mobile , > where one can simply enable GO TO by dragging a finger in the desired > direction on the screen (for X miles) which will bring up all the waypoints > in that direction in the right sequence of distance. > Would this be possible to implement? > Best to All. PeterK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: xcsoar-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net > To: xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:33 PM > Subject: Xcsoar-user Digest, Vol 72, Issue 11 > > Send Xcsoar-user mailing list submissions to > xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > xcsoar-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > xcsoar-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Xcsoar-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: double-click interval too short (David Anisman) > 2. Re: double-click interval too short (Tobias Bieniek) > 3. Bug with AAT (Luke Szczepaniak) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:35:58 -0700 > From: David Anisman <david.anis...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Xcsoar-user] double-click interval too short > To: Ramy Yanetz <ryan...@yahoo.com> > Cc: XCSoar Users List <xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net>, > "f...@math.uiuc.edu" <f...@math.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: > <CADyP8EBJvy+w2zYKTuyz_D=ppALCApcCa_4+MFq=suvnxg-...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Another one bites the dust.....enhancement request #2010 was just banished > to the Wishlist..... > > David > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ramy Yanetz <ryan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Kevin, there is already a bug #2010 for GoTo with precisely the same >> suggestion. Hopefully it will be implemented for 6.4. >> >> Ramy >> >> On May 17, 2012, at 3:44 PM, "Kevin Ford" <f...@math.uiuc.edu> wrote: >> >> > >> > I've made 3 flights with 6.3.1 and another problem arose (which will be >> > another ticket once I've sleuthed it a bit more). The wind calculation >> > from circling works early in the flight and then "quits" later, so in >> > thermalling mode I can see a pronounced drift instead of concentric >> > circles. I had no problems with 6.2.6. >> > >> > Back to the double-click issue, it still would be nice to have a quick >> way >> > to GoTo any airport on the map. In 6.3.3 this requires 4 operations >> > (click on airport, get the dreaded "map element..." page, clikc the >> > airport agai, click "Details" then click "Goto"). Try doing that >> > error-free in turbulence. How about when selecting an airport, that >> > "Goto" appears as one of the immediate options? >> > >> > Kevin >> > >> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 4:44 pm, Ramy Yanetz wrote: >> >> I am having the same issue when interacting with XCSoar, such as when >> >> trying to zoom and change pages. I often get the map list instead, >> >> which >> >> then require additional tap to cancel. >> >> >> >> I agree with Kevin that it will be better to show the map list only >> >> when >> >> tapping a waypoint or an airspace. I understand that the tradeoff will >> be >> >> not being able to check distance and arrival altitude to places which >> are >> >> not in the waypoint list. >> >> Other than that the map elements is a great feature when clicking on an >> >> area with multiple waypoints and/or airspace, allowing you to select >> >> the >> >> info you want. I just wish it would cover a little larger area, as it >> >> often takes multiple attempts to bring up a waypoint even when tapping >> >> carefully. >> >> >> >> >> >> Ramy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >> >>> From: Kevin Ford <f...@math.uiuc.edu> >> >>> To: XCSoar Users List <xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net> >> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 6:47 AM >> >>> Subject: [Xcsoar-user] double-click interval too short >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I opened a ticket on this issue. The double-click interval is very >> >>> short, >> >>> about 1/4 second in ver 6.3.1. In flight trying to double-tap with a >> >>> finger most often produces "Map element at this location" instead of >> >>> bringing up the main menu. This is incredibly annoying, as I had to >> hit >> >>> "Cancel" to get back to the map over and over again. Missing the >> >>> double-click interval in 6.2.6 simply did nothing and left me on the >> map >> >>> page, and the double-click interval was longer (at least 1/3 second on >> >>> the >> >>> linux version). In flight, since "Map element..." is a single-click >> >>> mode, >> >>> I thought that I wasn't tapping hard enough to register the >> >>> double-tap. >> >>> Harder and harder I tapped and still the same error :-( Only >> >>> experimenting with the linux version (with a mouse) did I find the >> actual >> >>> problem. >> >>> Further experimenting on the ground with my PNA revealed that light >> taps >> >>> do not often register, and double-hard taps take longer. I suggest >> >>> increasing the double-click interval to 1/2 second or more, now that >> >>> single-clicking on blank part of the map has another function in 6.3+. >> >>> Better yet, in addition remove the "single-click gives "Map >> >>> element..." >> >>> page" entirely. If I click on an airport, OK, but a single click on a >> >>> blank part of the map should not do anything (in turbulence it's easy >> to >> >>> accidently touch the screen if your hand is near). >> >>> >> >>> Kevin Ford >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >> >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >> Discussions >> >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >> malware >> >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Xcsoar-user mailing list >> >>> Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Xcsoar-user mailing list >> Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:43:43 +0200 > From: Tobias Bieniek <tobias.bien...@gmx.de> > Subject: Re: [Xcsoar-user] double-click interval too short > To: David Anisman <david.anis...@gmail.com> > Cc: XCSoar Users List <xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net>, > "f...@math.uiuc.edu" <f...@math.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: > <CABEOeTkfvd1i0MxwK5F0Zz60vZs5JC8p1hQCo--=+qw-7gy...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > well, adding a goto button to the waypoint list items unfortunatly > isn't technically quite as easy as it sounds. also I'm not sure if > this is such a good idea because an accidental click on the button > will have larger consequences. unless there is a better idea proposed > I'm not really keen on spending my time with this. I think that the > way to get to the goto button is okay, if you think differently find a > developer who agrees and improve the situation. remember that this is > open source software and if you don't agree with a decision that the > core developers make then you are free to use a personalised version > that fixes your issues. > > Turbo > > > 2012/6/21 David Anisman <david.anis...@gmail.com>: >> Another one bites the dust.....enhancement request #2010 was just banished >> to the Wishlist..... >> >> David >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ramy Yanetz <ryan...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> Kevin, there is already a bug #2010 for GoTo with precisely the same >>> suggestion. Hopefully it will be implemented for 6.4. >>> >>> Ramy >>> >>> On May 17, 2012, at 3:44 PM, "Kevin Ford" <f...@math.uiuc.edu> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > I've made 3 flights with 6.3.1 and another problem arose (which will be >>> > another ticket once I've sleuthed it a bit more). ?The wind calculation >>> > from circling works early in the flight and then "quits" later, so in >>> > thermalling mode I can see a pronounced drift instead of concentric >>> > circles. ?I had no problems with 6.2.6. >>> > >>> > Back to the double-click issue, it still would be nice to have a quick >>> > way >>> > to GoTo any airport on the map. ?In 6.3.3 this requires 4 operations >>> > (click on airport, get the dreaded "map element..." page, clikc the >>> > airport agai, click "Details" then click "Goto"). ?Try doing that >>> > error-free in turbulence. ?How about when selecting an airport, that >>> > "Goto" appears as one of the immediate options? >>> > >>> > Kevin >>> > >>> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 4:44 pm, Ramy Yanetz wrote: >>> >> I am having the same issue when interacting with XCSoar, such as when >>> >> trying to zoom and change pages. I often get the map list instead, >>> >> which >>> >> then require additional tap to cancel. >>> >> >>> >> I agree with Kevin that it will be better to show the map list only >>> >> when >>> >> tapping a waypoint or an airspace. I understand that the tradeoff will >>> >> be >>> >> not being able to check distance and arrival altitude to places which >>> >> are >>> >> not in the waypoint list. >>> >> Other than that the map elements is a great feature when clicking on >>> >> an >>> >> area with multiple waypoints and/or airspace, allowing you to select >>> >> the >>> >> info you want. I just wish it would cover a little larger area, as it >>> >> often takes multiple attempts to bring up a waypoint even when tapping >>> >> carefully. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Ramy >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: Kevin Ford <f...@math.uiuc.edu> >>> >>> To: XCSoar Users List ?<xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net> >>> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 6:47 AM >>> >>> Subject: [Xcsoar-user] double-click interval too short >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I opened a ticket on this issue. ?The double-click interval is very >>> >>> short, >>> >>> about 1/4 second in ver 6.3.1. ?In flight trying to double-tap with a >>> >>> finger most often produces "Map element at this location" instead of >>> >>> bringing up the main menu. ?This is incredibly annoying, as I had to >>> >>> hit >>> >>> "Cancel" to get back to the map over and over again. ?Missing the >>> >>> double-click interval in 6.2.6 simply did nothing and left me on the >>> >>> map >>> >>> page, and the double-click interval was longer (at least 1/3 second >>> >>> on >>> >>> the >>> >>> linux version). ?In flight, since "Map element..." is a single-click >>> >>> mode, >>> >>> I thought that I wasn't tapping hard enough to register the >>> >>> double-tap. >>> >>> Harder and harder I tapped and still the same error :-( ?Only >>> >>> experimenting with the linux version (with a mouse) did I find the >>> >>> actual >>> >>> problem. >>> >>> Further experimenting on the ground with my PNA revealed that light >>> >>> taps >>> >>> do not often register, and double-hard taps take longer. ?I suggest >>> >>> increasing the double-click interval to 1/2 second or more, now that >>> >>> single-clicking on blank part of the map has another function in >>> >>> 6.3+. >>> >>> Better yet, in addition remove the "single-click gives "Map >>> >>> element..." >>> >>> page" entirely. ?If I click on an airport, OK, but a single click on >>> >>> a >>> >>> blank part of the map should not do anything (in turbulence it's easy >>> >>> to >>> >>> accidently touch the screen if your hand is near). >>> >>> >>> >>> Kevin Ford >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>> >>> Discussions >>> >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>> >>> malware >>> >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Xcsoar-user mailing list >>> >>> Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net >>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xcsoar-user mailing list >>> Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Xcsoar-user mailing list >> Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:05:58 -0400 > From: Luke Szczepaniak <l...@silentflight.ca> > Subject: [Xcsoar-user] Bug with AAT > To: XCSoar <xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net> > Cc: Derek Mackie <itshd...@gmail.com>, Krzysztof Wiercioch > <k.wierci...@gmail.com>, Nick Bonniere > <nick.bonni...@withonestone.com> > Message-ID: > <cab9rgdxrbdjx+d56c0jpzjuogp35z4ylfhfizknf-psdtsz...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Everyone, > > We seem to have discovered a bug with 6.3.6 and 6.3.5 concerning AAT tasks. > I will try to describe what we are experiencing to the best of my ability, > I apologize in advance if I am not being clear. When creating the task the > Turn Areas are just big cylinders but all the calculations are done to the > center of the Turn Area, not the optimized point. The Target button is > missing from the calculator. You can change this by making the task to > racing, exiting out of task planner, going back into task planner, setting > the task to AAT then exiting the task planner again. I have confirmed this > with 2 other XCSoar users. After I roll back to 6.3.4 the issue > disappears, can someone else recreate this behaviour and let me know? If > so I will create a report in Bug Trac. > > Cheers, > Luke Szczepaniak > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xcsoar-user mailing list > Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user > > > End of Xcsoar-user Digest, Vol 72, Issue 11 > ******************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Xcsoar-user mailing list > Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
