Am Dienstag, 8. November 2005 06:11 schrieb Daniel Stone: Hi Danie,
> fd.o does not 'accept' standards. It does not have any process for > conferring standardisation or otherwise. All it does is host various > documents (as well as random other stuff) in the hope that some of it is > useful. This would be diluting the "brand" recognition and usefulness of fdo. Actually I expect that fdo does not randomly host any project like sourceforge. If fdo becomes another sf it would be immediately obsolete. So imho it is mandatory that for projects being hosted on fdo there is a rather larger consensus that they have the support from the majority of projects involved in fdo matters (e.g. KDE, GNOME, E, bb...) As can be seen from the thread there is a consensus that a naming specification is most useful but the Tango artwork is very controversial and actually sofar noone except the original Ximian guys embraced it. Regards, -- martin -- http://www.erfrakon.com/ Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
