On Thursday 10 November 2005 18:20, Richard Moore wrote: > Surely you agree that having the purpose of freedesktop.org misunderstood > cannot help its aims. From the website: > > 'Unlike a standards organization, freedesktop.org is a "collaboration > zone" where ideas and code are tossed around, and de facto > specifications are encouraged.' > > Except, that's not how it is often represented. This in turn harms its > use as a forum for collaborating.
So some people can't read and/or are deliberately misrepresenting fd.o. Find those people and beat them severely. Which is a bit of an empty directive without actual names of people to go after and brutalize. So, I must ask the crowd: who out there is actually saying freedesktop.org is a formal standardization body capable of enforcing the adoption of technologies or components? If you can't answer that question with the name of a particular individual, then you may now stop squawking about "misrepresentation", because you've disproved your own assertion. - ajax
pgpygFYcYiaFb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
